Daniel Mandell

Daniel Madell-7036.jpg

Daniel Mandell is currently serving as Legal Counsel to the President of the Republic of Palau, a

Freely Associated State with the United States of America. As one of two lawyers in the

President’s office, Daniel acts as a – if not the – chief legal advisor to not only the President and

his senior staff, but senior officials throughout the national executive branch. He is essentially

the general counsel to a company of 20,000 employees that also has a vote at the United Nations.

After he completes his time in Palau, Daniel will be a Council on Foreign Relations International

Affairs Fellow in Tokyo, Japan, where he will research ways for the U.S./Japan/Australia

trilateral relationship to work together on development projects in the Pacific region to counter

China’s Belt-and-Road initiative. He then has an offer to join the general counsel’s office of a

national security-focused federal agency in Washington, D.C.

Before Palau, Daniel served as a law clerk to Hon. Jack B. Weinstein, Senior District Judge for

the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (and, amongst other

incredible accomplishments, the last surviving member of the legal team that won Brown v.

Board of Education). He also spent seven and a half years as a litigation associate at two

international law firms in New York City and Washington, D.C. His practice focused on

complex commercial litigation, particularly on cases with an international aspect.

Daniel’s legal career began at Duke Law School, from which he graduated with both a J.D. and

LL.M. in international and comparative law. While at Duke, he was a research assistant for two

professors (helping one prepare congressional testimony on the so-called Torture Memos of the

Bush Administration, and the other with research on al Qaeda for a book on the organization), an

editor for the Alaska Law Review, a two-year member of the Jessup International Law Moot

Court Team, and a participant in both the Guantanamo Bay Defense Clinic (for which he

produced a 50-page historical narrative on the use of military commissions through United States

history, a paper that was subsequently published in the National Security Law Journal) and the

Appellate Litigation Clinic (where his team won a criminal appeal before the United States Court

of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit).

Daniel has also served as a core staff member on a victorious congressional campaign for his

home district in Florida, and as a Fellow at the non-profit government budget watchdog

organization, Taxpayers for Common Sense (where he was featured in a National Public Radio

report on rebuilding efforts in the Gulf Coast region following Hurricane Katrina). He has

published articles in several law journals and periodicals, is a Term Member of the Council on

Foreign Relations, and a member of the American Society of International Law. (Daniel also

spent a year in the Security Studies Program at Georgetown University, but that is a different

story).

Really, though, Daniel is what Tufts – and EPIIC – made him. It all started on mid-April day in

2001, one of those Boston days that experiences all four seasons within a 24-hour span. On that

Tufts April Open House day, Daniel learned of Sherman and this thing called EPIIC. It was a

presentation in Cohen Auditorium that he can recall to this day, almost exactly 20 years later.

Daniel left Tufts that day knowing that he wanted to be in EPIIC. Unfortunately, due to some

poor advising, Daniel did not sign-up for EPIIC his freshman year (but he did tell one of his new

Carmichael Hall neighbors, Shaharris Beh, about it – the same person who years later would give

Sherman the name for his new endeavor). Still, Daniel went to every EPIIC event he could,

coming to Sherman’s attention during the year. Daniel signed-up for EPIIC his sophomore year

(Sovereignty and Intervention), but due to class size restrictions, he was not selected for the

colloquium. Of course, being a persistent mensch who does not take ‘no’ very well, he

continued to attend EPIIC classes, taking every reading he could get his hands on. By the end of

the year he had essentially been adopted into the colloquium – really, his name is actually on the

symposium poster for the year. After a junior year abroad in London, Daniel returned to

Medford and finally officially joined the EPIIC colloquium his senior year for Oil and Water.

Daniel’s time with the Institute and EPIIC had two very significant impacts on him. First, it

changed him from an Americentric political science student to a globalist focused on

international relations and public international law (evidenced through his later decision to

pursue an extra degree in law school focusing on international and comparative law). Second, it

showed him that everyone – even 20-year-old college students – can engage with global leaders

and make a difference: that the concept of paying one’s dues as a junior cog in a wheel,

refraining from seeking to steer the boat until a level of seniority is achieved, is nonsense. Of

course, Daniel already had a chip on his shoulder as a high school debater, but spending time in a

place where students were never told ‘no’ was truly transformational. (The characterization of

IGL as a place where students were never told no is attributed to Gwyn Prins). As a result of his

time at the Institute, Daniel was not only exposed to world leaders, but also to students who have

become leaders in his generation. That he can call himself a friend to some of these amazing

people is one of the things he is most proud of.

Which leads him to the Convisero Mentors. Daniel is eager to be an active member of the

Convisero network, and looks forward to interacting with the myriad intellectual and

professional superstars that are in its orbit.

Daniel recently put on two virtual events through CFR, the first one featuring John Hennessey-Niland. They are available on demand at:

Term Member Virtual Meeting: The Future of the United States in the Pacific

Term Member Virtual Meeting: The Future of the United States in the Pacific -- Part Two