From Community 3

SDE Teiman and Beyond: A Dive into Israel's Detention of Palestinians in the Shadow of War

Dear friends

As the world's eye is turned to Gaza, a parallel, sinister crisis has unfolded for the past 9 months. Dozens of incarcerated Palestinians from both Gaza and the West Bank have died in Israeli detention centers. Hundreds have suffered medical neglect, and many have been subjected to abuse and torture at the Sde Teiman military base and other facilities.
 
Join Physicians for Human Rights Israel for an English-language Webinar that will delve into these and other issues, including the Israeli medical system's complicity in some of these rights violations, the latest updates on Sde Teiman, and the denial of medical treatment in the Israeli prison system.
 

Tuesday, July 2nd at 7 PM Jerusalem time/12 PM EDT

Speakers:

Ms. Oneg Ben Dror, Project Coordinator, PHRI's Prisoners and Detainees DepartmentMs. Hadas Ziv, Director of Medical Ethics at PHRIDr. Lina Qassem-Hassan, Chairperson of PHRI's Board and a family physician with experience treating incarcerated Palestinians

Hosted by Ms. Lee Caspi, Director of Resource Development at PHRI
 Sign up here

 
Best regards,
Lee Caspi
Director of Resource Development
Physicians for Human Rights Israel (PHRI)

A ‘Free Russia’ Passport Could Undermine Putin

Welcoming Those Who Want To Break With The Russian Leader’s Regime Would Mobilize A Key Community To Help Ukraine To Victory.

By Garry Kasparov and Mikhail Khodorkovsky

The war in Ukraine is now well into its third year, and Western support for the country has faltered dangerously.

While the U.S. Congress did pass an aid bill after months of fitful negotiations, the assistance came late — and at great cost. In the interim, Russia took advantage of Kyiv’s shortfall in munitions, dramatically intensifying the shelling of key cities. The EU, for its part, did pass a multibillion-euro defense package in March, but the bloc remains deeply divided over the scope and type of military assistance.

In light of all this, commentary has rightly focused on the need to provide adequate support that would allow Ukraine to defend itself on the battlefield. This must remain a key area of attention. However, the West has other avenues at its disposal to help Ukraine win — and these can and must be explored too.

We speak on behalf of all the Russians who believe in the potential for a free and democratic Russia. Neither of us have been able to return home for decades because of our opposition to the regime. Thankfully, with the resources available to us, we’ve been able to establish new homes and lives for ourselves and our families in the West. But the same opportunities aren’t available to the millions of Russians who, like us, don’t support Putin’s criminal system.

At this critical juncture in the struggle for Ukraine’s sovereignty, we have an opportunity to give these Russians the chance to make the same moral choice to break with the Putin regime — and, in doing so, mobilize a key community to help Ukraine to victory.

Let us be clear about what is at stake: the freedom and self-determination of millions of Ukrainians and their government’s right to territorial integrity. But the consequences extend far beyond one country’s borders. A victory for Putin’s regime would be a clear sign that the world’s democracies aren’t able to stand together in a firm coalition to uphold their core values and support their members in need.

But we still have an opportunity to change the outcome — if we act now — and affirm that democratic institutions and values are stronger and more sustainable than what authoritarians offer.

Thus, as a vital step in the international fight for Ukraine and against Putinism, we propose the creation of a single, harmoniously operating community of pro-Western Russians, which would serve as a crucial link in the broader Western web of opposition against the regime.

Practically speaking, Russians who wish to join this group would be required to sign the Berlin Declaration, which sets out the key principles for a Ukrainian victory and a Russia without Putin. After passing the necessary checks, signatories would then be issued documents recognizing them as members of a “Free Russia,” which would allow them to obtain visas and enter all countries participating in the agreement.

This would create a powerful incentive for more Russians to disavow Putin and emigrate. Many of the over one million citizens who have already departed the Russian Federation are highly educated. And the more that leave Russia, the greater the “brain drain” Putin’s regime suffers, leaving fewer intellectual resources for him to develop new deadly technologies and fewer soldiers to send to the front.

Unfortunately, Russians who have left their country behind often find themselves in a state of limbo and at risk of politically motivated extradition, living, for the most part, in Georgia, Armenia, Turkey or Central Asian countries, unable to seek refuge in Europe. Many would gladly join in the fight against Putin openly. However, with expiring passports, uncertain residency and no representation, this is an impossibility.

These individuals aren’t in need of economic assistance — they’re fully capable of supporting themselves. The system we propose would give them the opportunity to help themselves, their families and the West by supporting the international struggle against Putinism openly and without fear.

If the idea sounds far-fetched or impractical, we point to a historical example that suggests otherwise: Nansen passports, developed for stateless persons in the political chaos following World War I, were issued by the League of Nations after the Russian government officially revoked the citizenship of hundreds of thousands of Russians abroad. Named after Norwegian politician Fridtjof Nansen, their chief promoter on the international stage, nearly half a million Nansen passports were issued during their nearly two-decade existence. And the office responsible for their operation was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for its work in combating this massive displacement crisis.

While the parallel is imperfect — as historical analogs always are — the growing number of Russians disaffected with Putin’s rule today similarly stand to have their lives transformed by such international recognition. In recent days though, Norway, along with Finland, banned the entry of Russian tourists (with few exceptions for essential travel and humanitarian reasons). And while the measure signals a strong stance against Putin’s war, it offers no way of distinguishing between Russians who fall in line behind him and those who seek to disavow him. It only further points to the urgent need for an international juridical mechanism for making precisely this kind of distinction.

As the war staggers on, we must use all the resources at our disposal — military, economic and legal — to help Ukraine prevail. The establishment of an extraterritorial free Russia, so to speak, with international recognition, would mark a crucial step toward Ukraine’s victory, dramatically shifting the balance of power in the struggle between democracy and dictatorship.

We cannot shy away from the truth that victory for Ukraine entails the full defeat of Putin’s regime. The steps we take to ensure Ukraine’s future are also steps that pave the way for a free, fair and democratic Russia aligned with the West. We urge the leaders of the free world to take this proposal seriously: to bring like-minded Russians to their side of the current fight and, as a result, integrate them into the international democratic fabric.

Rachel Svetanoff keynote panelist for UN Foundation's Intergenerational Townhall

Convisero mentor Rachel Svetanoff sits alongside two UN youth leaders, Ose Ehianeta Arheghan and Sophia Kianni, on the National Visions for 2100 Intergenerational Townhall for the UN Foundation’s Our Future Agenda program in collaboration with United Nations Association of the USA at the 2024 Leadership Summit. Each panelist shared lessons learned about youth activism that came from lived experience, demonstrating their diligence and passion for solving issues that face current generations today and future generations. This townhall is part of Our Future Agenda’s intergenerational action initiative where participants also crafted solutions surrounding 12 ideas for future generations. Rachel and her colleagues facilitated round table discussions who shared their ideas for creating pathways pathways forward towards a shared vision of intergenerational unity.

The United Nations Association of the USA (UNA-USA) was selected to serve as the main implementing partner in the United States for the Intergenerational Town Hall Series. This initiative, underpinned by the United Nations Foundation and supported through the Unlock the Future Coalition, provides the opportunity for 16 UN member states to host Town Halls that are designed to engage, empower, and elevate voices of young people and future generations.

The Intergenerational Town Halls are designed to convene a diverse assembly of participants and speakers, ranging from visionary young leaders and activists to seasoned policymakers, experts, and global thought leaders.  UNA-USA encourages and welcomes non-members to participate in these Town Hall elements, so that their voices are heard and represented within the cumulative report that will be developed from the consultations.

13th Festival of Pacific Arts & Culture

The Festival of Pacific Arts & Culture (FestPAC) is the world’s largest celebration of indigenous Pacific Islanders. The South Pacific Commission (now The Pacific Community - SPC) launched this dynamic showcase of arts and culture in 1972 to halt the erosion of traditional practices through ongoing cultural exchange. The 13th Festival of Pacific Arts & Culture, will convene in Hawaiʻi, 6–16 June 2024. “Ho‘oulu Lāhui: Regenerating Oceania” will serve as the theme of FestPAC Hawaiʻi 2024, honoring the traditions that FestPAC exists to perpetuate with an eye toward the future.

Michael Niconchuk and Justine Hardy at the 35th Annual Boston International Trauma Conference - Trauma Research Foundation

Watch video trailer here!!

Opening remarks by Convisero mentor Mike Niconchuk:

Good morning and welcome.

I want to thank each of you for being here. And I want to thank the Trauma Research Foundation for opening this space. Bruce, for his new and exciting leadership of TRF. Wendy, for her work on this event and globally-recognized leadership in the field of trauma, and Carrie, who puts so much effort into this event. Of course I also want to thank Bessel for deeply considering the relationships between trauma, social unrest, violence, and social repair and suggesting this topic feature prominently at the very start of the event.

And you—you chose to be here, in person or online, to engage with content that is explicitly emotional, sensitive, and likely personal for many of you. Conflict, violence, trauma, and social division. This topic is imminent and painful for so many reasons. By virtue of our location today on historically stolen lands, police brutality against student protests here in Boston, the anguish of Palestinian families watching their families killed daily in Gaza, the daily arrival of hundreds of persons fleeing rampant violence in Haiti, rising anti-Semitism, the intersection of trauma and violent conflict is evident here in this city—and the world over. The line between the “here” and the “there” has broken, and many of you probably interact with the tendrils and legacies of displacement, war, and social rupture in your work.

And we must speak into the room Gaza. We will not focus intensely on it, as it is not mine to speak about, but it is naturally something on the mind and in the heart, as it is a trauma that speaks to the intergenerational and collective, to identity, the metastatic pain that dismantles dichotomies between victim and perpetrator.

I am confident that feelings of unsafety, anger, or fear emerge even at its mere invocation.

And know, from the bottom of my heart, that I wish for each of you a life of safety, just as I wish the same for the people Gaza, of Sudan, of Congo, Haiti, Ecuador, Burkina Faso, Iraq, Ukraine, Los Angeles, incarceration facilities in this country, and elsewhere.

And we take a breath together. Find those safety resources within yourself as we go through the day. Invoke them, use them.

It is my true desire that each of you in this room and online live a life of safety. A life of safety in which your own and your policymakers pursuit of your safety is not at the expense of the life of less desirable others. And today we are not here to adjudicate blame, but to elevate trauma and the necessity of exploring trauma healing contexed within broader social and political issues.

I wish for you a life of safety, because that is what it is all about—as a species, as mental health workers, as advocates. We work to create safety in the self, in relationships, and in the world around us. For those who have experienced trauma, opportunity without safety is a false gift. Decades of violence in communities can impact health outcomes for generations, can rupture families and social cohesion, and can exacerbate inequities. Safety in the body and mind, in such adverse circumstances, is wildly difficult, and we must continue innovating in the creation of safety in mind, body, relationships, land, and material circumstances.

Today is highly personal for me.

The act of centering myself on this stage could be construed as a gross act of privilege, but my intention is to bring us immediately to a critical point that Justine Hardy, Homeboy Industries, and the Violence Intervention Project will investigate in great detail: trauma and violence are personal. And only by elevating the urgency, dignity, and beauty of persons will we be able to couple our pursuit of healing and our pursuits of justice.

To be blunt, I am enraged at the actions of this country’s government in sustaining active conflicts and adding embers to situations where they could easily as add water. In many ways, there is something particularly infuriating about working on conflict-related trauma, because violence is not an act of God; it is an act of mankind. Often I find myself incredulous at the reality of global mental health financing; as the same actors involved in the harm of populations then ask for bids to go innovate on dealing with the trauma left behind. It is akin to cigarette companies funding heart disease interventions in the communities with the greatest sales.

One of my best friends is at the moment on a perilous and criminalized journey to safety for himself and his family. He, a refugee who first fled war in 2012, is somewhere in a Russian, or Belorussian, or Polish forest. Perhaps frostbitten, perhaps about to get shot, perhaps soon to be attacked by police dogs, perhaps totally safe—smuggling himself into Europe because that—the decaying heart of empire—is the only place that he can fathom safety. Foreign aid money, which has historically been used as a form of soft power and influence, has all but dried up for refugee camps in greater Syria (bilad ash-Sham), and he has struggled for 9 months to make enough money picking tomatoes, in order to feed his children, including one with specific health needs. My heart breaks that he feels there is no easier way. And I am angry that this is the landscape of choice he has—risk life, limb, and crushing debt to undertake a life-threatening journey where, even if successful, you will be separated from your family for 2 years, or wallow in a tent or decaying apartment where every aspect of your existence is dependent on aid resources that are rapidly drying up now that your people are not politically relevant. That we have built a world where material scarcity, forced poverty, and internationally influenced civil wars are written off as “unfortunate traumas.”

Days ago, I told him not to go. That we will try to find another way.

He was weeping.

I told him, “Habibi, you could die. Are you willing to risk your children losing their father?”

He paused, and said, “But they already have.” He continued sobbing.

They have lost him to depression, hopelessness, trauma, shame, guilt, fear.

What is the work with this man? A breathing exercise? Cognitive reframing? EMDR—for which trauma? For his PTSD or his depression or his hopelessness or his anger or his anxiety? A life of dignity is not a treatment protocol. That is not to say trauma healing work is irrelevant for this man—but there is simply no post- to his post-trauma challenges.

It is heavy. This work is heavy. And we are not here to shy away from it, but to explore how what we know how to do—this like build relational containers of healing and hope, building regulation in the body, investing in spiritual, emotional, psychological, and interpersonal resources towards healing—to explore how these things are complicated by the realities of war, separation, violence, politics, racism, and social division.

Today we aim to connect dots, for the context of violence, disconnection, and injustice is universal. Where power, greed, identity threat, and perceived status loss go, so does violence. And that is not to suggest such traumatic experiences are inevitable, but rather that the challenge at hand is massive for those in the field of mental health and psychosocial support. What we see in parts of Los Angeles—as we will hear today—or what we see in the Kashmir Valley or in the Republic of the Maldives or Gaza—is connected. To be interested in the mental health of survivors of violence and conflict without being interested in their justice is insufficient at best, and complicit at worst.

This is where the etiology of PTSD, stress related disorders, and sub-pathological adaptations in the self, relationships and communities pushes us into a difficult position. In some cases we know so clearly the causes of harm. In many conflicts our tax dollars drop the bombs that cause the trauma and then agencies based in those countries get the big contracts to respond to the trauma. It’s a perverse cycle.

Is the role of the mental health practitioner or psychosocial support worker inherently political? How can privilege and class and foreign intervention destroy local ways of healing? And at the same time how can privilege and platforms be leveraged to do the work of undoing the structural sources of harm? How do we build sustainable teams in such environments? Where are the bright spots in new protocols and ways of working that can bring hope and agency even in the most adverse circumstances. Where do we see those bright spots of innovation that honor the local, offer agency to survivors, and work around systems that are unwilling or unable to change in the timeframe needed.

In the case of trauma and conflict, I sit in a pile of my own unintended complicity, while also fiercely trying to get this right. So how do we dare do work? Carefully, with humility and permission. With radical empathy as we know how trauma metastasizes in self and society, and we understand that grace, dialogue, and healing are necessary parts of justice.

We will start today with Justine Hardy, who will take us to the Kashmir Valley, a site of decades of violence, and millennia of beauty, art, faith, and complexity. We will then talk about one of many elephants in the room—extremism—and the delicate work of trauma-responsive care for persons exiting violent extremist groups. I will focus on collective work with returnees from the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq, while calling out our obsession with violence in the Islamic world, when in reality, much of what goes on in this country should be equally as vilified and understood in the context of history and policy. After lunch we will shift geographies, focusing the city of Los Angeles, exploring innovative models of care for persons exiting incarceration, and in bringing neurofeedback to communities that have long suffered the consequences of injustice, racism, and systemic exclusion.

Today will be uncomfortable, eye opening, and challenging.

Justine Hardy’s outline:

I was talking about trans-generational trauma, and though the following is only in bullet point, and without the elegance of Mike’s introductory comments, it gives an outline:

 

  • The different impacts across several generations living through (and within) the same conflict. 

  • How to begin to address the misunderstandings and differences between the trauma of each generation.

  • How to support and accompany those who are ‘frozen’ (psychologically paralysed) by trauma in settings where there is little or no recourse to treatments other than the heavy bombardment of pharmacology and what an individual therapist can do face-to-face with the people they are working with.

  • Working with the next generation, exploring ways of interrupting the cycles of violence that play out across the generations.

  • Working somatically (in the mind-body continuum) both preventatively and curatively to give people the agency of understanding what is happening within their nervous system responses and how this interacts with their minds, mood and capacity to function.

Combatants for Peace: The 19th Israeli-Palestinian Joint Memorial Day Ceremony

Dear Friends,

We are excited to announce the launch of the 2024 Annual Israeli-Palestinian Joint Memorial Day Ceremony. In the midst of the violence, the despair and the most divided society in our history, we are choosing to follow a different path.

Now in its 19th year, the ceremony is a chance to reflect, to mourn, to acknowledge the pain of the other but also to feel there is hope. Since October 7th 2023, tens of thousands of lives have been cut short, families torn apart, children traumatized - now more than ever we need to continue to show up for one another, to demand an end to the war and call for a political solution that brings freedom, justice and safety for all. In mourning together, we seek not to equate experiences, but rather transform despair into hope and build compassion around our shared humanity. We remind ourselves and the world that occupation, oppression, and conflict are not inevitable. 

The ceremony takes place on the eve of “Yom Ha’Zikaron” (Israeli Memorial Day for Fallen Soldiers and Victims of Terror). It is one of the most somber days in Israel- where everything shuts down, the state TV channels only broadcast coverage of the national memorial ceremony- and everything feels very dark. But our ceremony is different. You will hear from both Israelis and Palestinians bereaved through conflict and feel the light seep in as we come together to both remember the past and look ahead to a brighter future.

The theme of the ceremony this year will focus on the stories of children. Children whose only crime was being born Palestinian or Israeli. What will be the future of the next generation?

Please, support the ceremony, so we can truly show the world that this is the will of the people, that the international community is behind us, and together, we can create a more peaceful future. Last year we had 300,000 people with us live - let’s grow our community, and declare once again - war is not an act of fate, there is another way!

In Peace & Solidarity from Israel/Palestine,

Rana Salman & Eszter Koranyi

Co-Directors, Combatants for Peace